top of page

Delhi High Court Overrules GST Refund Rejection for McDonald's India

Writer's picture: Rahul JainRahul Jain

In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has issued a significant ruling regarding the GST refund application filed by McDonald's India. The case revolves around the nature of services provided by McDonald's India to McDonald's USA and the eligibility for claiming input tax credits. Let's delve into the details of this intriguing case.


Background:

McDonald's India, acting as a service provider for McDonald's USA, raised export invoices on a cost plus 10% mark-up basis. The services rendered by McDonald's India included market research, vendor/supplier reference checks, training, and onsite visits. McDonald's India claimed that these services qualified as 'zero-rated supplies' under the GST Act, entitling them to a refund of input tax credits.


The GST Authority's Rejection:

However, the GST authority rejected McDonald's India's claim, arguing that the services provided were of an 'intermediary' nature and, therefore, could not be considered as exports. This decision was also upheld by the Appellate authority, leading McDonald's India to challenge the rejection.


Delhi High Court's Observation:

The Delhi High Court carefully examined the scope of services mentioned in the service agreement between McDonald's India and McDonald's USA. The court noted that the services did not entail 'procurement or facilitating services' from third parties. Additionally, it observed that the GST authority's Show Cause Notice lacked detailed reasoning for the denial of the GST refund.


Court's Ruling and Remand:

Based on its observations, the Delhi High Court set aside the rejection order and remanded the matter back to the GST Authority for a fresh consideration of McDonald's India's GST refund application. This decision provides a ray of hope for McDonald's India to potentially secure the refund they sought.


The Delhi High Court's ruling in the McDonald's India GST refund case highlights the importance of clarity and detailed reasoning in tax-related decisions. As this case progresses, it will undoubtedly have implications for businesses operating in similar service-oriented industries. Stay tuned for further updates on this crucial matter.


Source: W.P.(C) 11430/2022 dated 18.05.2023


Comments


RJ Asset_Vertical Teal.png

© by Rahul Jain | All rights reserved

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
bottom of page